This spring I was asked to give a keynote speech at my alma mater and tell a group of physics students about the last fifteen years of my life since graduation. I was flattered, of course, but also baffled because when I was in school, my grades were not the best and I had no idea what I wanted to do with my life.
Now that I am fully vaccinated, I should be excited about seeing friends and family again, but the prospect of socializing has filled me with more anxiety than relief. I’ve gotten used to a quieter, more mindful existence over the past year, and as “returning to normal” looms on the horizon, I can admit that there are some things I don’t want back.
Voters across PA will soon be selecting judges for several court seats, including their Courts of Common Pleas. There is very little visibility into the workings of the court system, making it exceptionally hard to make an educated decision. Fortunately, some of my friends are attorneys who work in the county court system and helped me understand what to look for in a good candidate.
Ballot questions are often written to be confusing and take advantage of psychological principles. Because of that, Pennsylvanians and Americans in general are unlikely to vote them down. This week, we’ll take a closer look at how the PA legislators are about to grant themselves more power without ever needing a super-majority to do it. (And remember to request your ballot if you haven’t already!)
Disproportionate attention is given to our presidential elections every four years, and we’re so exhausted afterwards that we never want to think about politics again. However, state and local elections are full of important decisions, which is why ignoring them has made presidential elections increasingly more dire. The ballot measures in this year’s PA primary are open to all voters and need our attention.
Over the past several months, we have been inundated with information, disinformation, and opinions about every aspect of COVID-19: origin, prevention, treatment, and political implications of each. In this digital world, it can be incredibly difficult to differentiate fact from fiction, leaving all of us open to dubious information that can encourage doubt – even in the most scientifically minded among us.
After eight weeks of Marie Kondo’s challenge, I can see small improvements throughout my house, but there’s a long way to go before reaching the goals I set in Week 1. Through this journey, the real transformation has not been with my things, but with me. By practicing mindful, daily gratitude for the last two months, I do feel more joy – and that is magical.
“Storage experts are hoarders,” says Marie Kondo. My struggle through the Miscellaneous category continues as I organize and store consumable goods that still that I can’t donate but can’t bring myself to trash. Our storage space is currently limited by roof and attic work, making the process even more frustrating, but hopefully keeping me more honest about what has a place in my future.
The term “Sentimental Items” can apply to pretty much everything in my house, which means that as I continue to tackle “Miscellaneous,” I can also hone my skills on what Marie Kondo has referred to as the hardest category. This post examines why it’s so hard for us to part with things in general and why I hold on for (maybe) too long.
Miscellaneous items make up the largest category in Marie Kondo’s tidying plan, and from what I can tell, that basically means everything in our house. There was no way I would get through everything Miscellaneous in one week, but I really thought I’d accomplish more than just the bathroom closet. There will certainly be more work to come after this eight-week challenge is over.