While I have some friends and colleagues who are Muslim, I knew little of the religion’s general food restrictions beyond pork and alcohol. With Islam currently practiced by 2 billion people across the globe, it seemed like a perfect opportunity to examine the overlap between halal (“legal”) and vegan foods. Interestingly, many highly Muslim countries already had vegan or vegan-friendly cuisines to start.
My knowledge of the Eastern Orthodox church is limited, aside from their fantastic food festivals and some basic history about their split with Catholicism in 1054. Given their continued practice of strict fasts throughout the year, countries with ties to this church have developed some delicious (and even indulgent) vegan-friendly dishes. I happily produced a delicious Georgian recipe in my own kitchen.
Coming into 2026 I wanted to make a concerted effort to eat less dairy. Coming into Lent, I was curious to learn more about how religion has influenced one of my favorite vegan-friendly cuisines: Italian. Not all heavily Catholic countries lend themselves to plant-based diets, so I’m kicking off a Lenten exploration of culinary adaptations to religious limitations (and religious adaptations to culinary limitations).
If Gandhi told us to “be the change you wish to see in the world,” this post represents the words I need to hear right now. Between battling depression, interpersonal conflicts, and existential threats to humanity, I haven’t been feeling very motivated lately. My mom always inspired me to change the world for the better, but her absence is making that a difficult ask right now.
When I think of mothers, I think of almost ritualistic, uncomplaining sacrifice for their families, often to their own detriment. Something we rarely discuss related to motherhood is the level of agency involved in that decision and how critical it is that people become parents when they’re ready for it. What some call an unsavory topic, I call a necessary component of comprehensive healthcare.
While working through this series, it became apparent that the issue was bigger than that of having or not having kids. In our very divided world, it seems like part of me wanted to close out this series with an attempt to find some common ground between two polarizing figures and their very different philosophies. This week: how moral development plays into the picture.
I’ve asked some friends probing questions about Catholicism and Objectivism over the last few weeks to make sure I was interpreting Pope Francis and Ayn Rand correctly for the arguments I’m putting forth in this series. But they had some questions for me, which made me realize I had to examine the context of a third person for this series: the author.
If the first installment of this series wasn’t polarizing enough with a look at Pope Francis and his comments about childless couples, Part Two brings in another controversial figure – Ayn Rand – for her take on what selfishness is and why it isn’t inherently bad. Is this examination a justification of my own life choices or just a fun foray into philosophy and theology? To be determined…
Pope Francis made headlines early this year after making an off-hand comment about couples who have pets instead of children. Internet backlash was swift and severe, but it made me curious to learn more about what he actually said and what the religious context was behind his statement. It also prompted a lot of conversations with friends and family about making parenthood decisions.